Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANIL L PANSARE, NIVEDITA P MEHTA
Judgment
16wp337.25IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPURCRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.337/2025Viraj Suhas Patil .Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. Akshay Naik, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. K. S. Motwani, Advocatefor petitioner. Mr. S. S. Doifode, A.P.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Ms Bhavya C. Dhruv, Advocate for respondent No.9. Mr. K. R. Bhise, Advocate for respondent No.10.Mr. Shyam Jaiswal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 11 and 12. CORAM :ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.DATE :APRIL 8, 2026.Remark of the Registry shows that respondent Nos.13 and14 are not yet served.
Mr. Akshay Naik, learned Senior Counsel for petitioner submits that these respondents are in jail. The petitioners made an attempt to serve them through private mode. However, they refused to accept the service. Superintendent of Jail has issued acommunication to that effect, which includes the respondents’acknowledgment that they do not want to receive the copy of petition. He submits that affidavit of service will be filed within two working days. Be filed.
Registry shall go through the affidavit and examine whether notice is served to these respondents. List thereafter. (JUDGE)(JUDGE)Kahale
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.