BNSS No. 45232 of 2025 · Allahabad High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The full Bench judgment passed in Ghulam Rasool Khan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others the Court in para-17 (iii) has held that Question No. (III) is answered in negative holding that the aggrieved person having remedy of appeal under Section 14A…
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 45232 of 2025 Muzahid Ali State of U.P. and Another Versus .....Applicant(s) .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : : Prem Prakash G.A. Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
The full Bench judgment passed in Ghulam Rasool Khan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others the Court in para-17 (iii) has held that Question No. (III) is answered in negative holding that the aggrieved person having remedy of appeal under Section 14A of the 1989 Act, cannot be allowed to invoke inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
In view of the aforesaid judgment, the applicant is permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
The application is, accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
Certified copy of the F.I.R./order sheet be returned to the applicant as per rule after retaining a photo-stat copy of the same on the record. November 17, 2025 SKD (Deepak Verma,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.