M/S Agarwal Khandelal And Associates Charted v. Ragistrar Of Companies
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 528
- Companies Act, 2013 ss. 227(3)(d), 233, 441
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Considering the submissions raised at the Bar, the application stands disposed of granting liberty to the applicants to prefer appropriate proceeding for compounding under Section 441 of the Indian Companies Act, 2013 and in case such proceeding is preferred before the court concerned, then…
Judgment
Applicant :- M/S Agarwal Khandelal And Associates Charted Accountants Opposite Party :- Ragistrar Of Companies Counsel for Applicant :- Farooque Ahmad, Giri Ram Rawat, Indra Deo Mishra, Sangeeta Yadav, Shri Ram (Rawat) Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
Learned counsel for the applicants on instructions submits that though the application has been preferred to quash summoning order dated 03.10.2024 passed by learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra including entire Criminal Proceedings in Case no 36/2019 and complaint case No 5665/ 2019 Under Section 227(3) (d) read with section 233 of the Companies Act 1956 of Police Station New Agra, Distt. Agra, however, he confines his relief for compounding under Section 441 of the Indian Companies Act, 2013.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the same.
Considering the submissions raised at the Bar, the application stands disposed of granting liberty to the applicants to prefer appropriate proceeding for compounding under Section 441 of the Indian Companies Act, 2013 and in case such proceeding is preferred before the court concerned, then this Court has no reason to disbelieve that the same shall be decided with most expedition strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 piyush
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Companies Act, 2013 — ss. 227(3)(d), 233, 441.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 29 Jul 2025. The bench was VIKAS BUDHWAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.