CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C v. State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home U.P
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PANKAJ BHATIA
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 376
Judgment
: Mohd. Imran Khan : G.A., Pinki Devi, Shri Prakash Verma Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR/Case Crime No.328 of 2021 under section 376 IPC, P.S. Poora Kalandar, District Ayodhya.
It is argued that the applicant was granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 23.06.2025. It is argued that the charge- sheet has been filed and there is nothing on record to show that the applicant did not cooperate with the investigation, as such, the interim bail granted is made absolute till the conclusion of the trial.
Thus, the present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed.
In the event of applicant Mohd. Talib surrendering before the trial court, he shall be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number till conclusion of the trial on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each separately to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of 2 ABAIL No. 675 of 2025 which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. December 8, 2025 VNP/- (Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.