✦ Allahabad High Court · 10 Jul 2025

Salimun Nisha v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3

CR.P.C No. 94 of 2025S SANGEETA CHANDRA, BRI

Case at a glance

Judgment

This Appeal has been filed under Section 413 of the B.N.S.S. 2023 (Section 372 of the Cr.P.C.) against the acquittal of the private respondents by judgement and order dated 06.06.2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.4/Special Judge (E.C. Act), Gonda in Session Trial No. 704/2021, [State Versus Rohit Chauhan @ Suresh Kumar and others], arising out of case crime no. 73 of 2021, under section 302 of IPC, Police Station - Khodare, District- Gonda, acquitting the accused Rohit Chauhan @ Suresh Kumar, Mohit Chauhan @ Mahendra Kumar & Sunil Kumar Yadav from the charge of section 302 of IPC. Admit. Summon the Trial Court Record. Learned A.G.A. has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent no.1. Issue bailable warrants of Rs. 15,000/- against the respondent nos.2, 3 and 4- Rohit Chauhan @ Suresh Kumar, Mohit Chauhan @ Mahendra Kumar & Sunil Kumar Yadav to be served through the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned. If they are arrested or surrender before the court concerned, they shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing two sureties and personal bonds of the like amount each, on the undertaking that they shall appear before this Court through their counsel or in person on the next date of listing and the court below shall transmit their bail bonds to this Court. List on 21.8.2025. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Anuj Singh

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 372; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 413; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 302.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 10 Jul 2025. The bench was S SANGEETA CHANDRA, BRI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CR.P.C No. 94 of 2025). ← Search more judgments