Raghavendra Singh v. District Magistrate And 6 Others
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 02 Jul 2025
- Bench
- MUNIR
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC:101755
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
This Court in the exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution do not sit as a recommendatory body to recommend the case of one litigant to the other for favourable consideration. After all, the petitioner and the District Magistrate are both the litigants before the Court, where the petitioner has some grievance against the other litigant, that is to say, the District Magistrate. This petition as framed is misconceived so long the petitioner does not come up with a substantive prayer seeking relief against the respondents, including the District Magistrate. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to the petitioner file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, properly framed and carrying substantive relief, as advised. Let this order be communicated to the District Magistrate, Prayagraj through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad by the Registrar (Compliance) within 24 hours. Order Date :- 2.7.2025 Deepak
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 02 Jul 2025. The bench was MUNIR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.