✦ Allahabad High Court · 24 Mar 2025

Pooja And 3 Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko & Anr.

No. 1563 of 2025RAJNISH KUMAR

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

On an objection raised by learned AGA as well as Sri Atul Kumar Singh Gaur, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 that the petitioners have statutory remedy under Section 482 Cr.P.C., therefore, this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable, Sri Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks some time to argue on the maintainability. As prayed, list on 26.03.2025 as fresh. Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Akanksha Sri/-

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Constitution of India — art. 227.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 24 Mar 2025. The bench was RAJNISH KUMAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 1563 of 2025). ← Search more judgments