Samar Nath & Anr. v. Presiding Officer, Motor Accidental Claim Tribunal
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 20 Mar 2025
- Bench
- PANKA
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC-LKO:16256
Outcome
Disposed of
writ petition is disposed off directing the opposite party no
Provisions considered
Judgment
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel.
The present petition has been filed with the following prayer : "Issue an order or direction thereby commanding the opposite party no. 1 to decide the M.A.C.P. No. 288 /2022, under Section-166, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Samar Nath & another Vs. Amit Kumar Verma & Others) is pending before the Learned Presiding Officer Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Sultanpur within stipulated period, as early as possible, contained herewith as Annexure No. 1 to this petition, in the interest of justice. "
Operative part
Considering the prayer limited to the issue of mandamus, the writ petition is disposed off directing the opposite party no.1 to decide the M.A.C.P. No. 288/2022, under Section-166, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Samar Nath & another Vs. Amit Kumar Verma & Others) expeditiously within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 VNP/-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: writ petition is disposed off directing the opposite party no
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 20 Mar 2025. The bench was PANKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.