Jalindhar Bhouso Ranaware v. Satara & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The Interim Application stands disposed of accordingly
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. The Interim Application stands disposed of accordingly. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] [ R.G. AVACHAT J.] 2 of 2
Judgment
Mr. Mithil A. Kadagave, Advocate for the applicant. ….. S. N. Deshmukh, AGP for respondents-State. ….. CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ. DATE : 16th FEBRUARY, 2026. P.C:
The learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that the present Letters Patent Appeal came to be dismissed by order dated 7th November 2019 passed by this Court for want of prosecution.
Mr. Mithil Kadgave, learned Advocate for the Applicant, submits that the matter was inadvertently not noted by the then Advocate appearing for the Petitioner, and therefore the matter could not be prosecuted. 1 of 2
He further submits that the Petitioner shall hereafter diligently prosecute the matter and ensure timely representation.
For the reasons stated in the Interim Application, the same is allowed.
The order dated 7th November 2019 dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal for want of prosecution is recalled. The Letters Patent Appeal is restored to its original file.
Operative part
The Interim Application stands disposed of accordingly. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] [ R.G. AVACHAT J.] 2 of 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Interim Application stands disposed of accordingly
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 16 Feb 2026. The bench was R G AVACHAT, AJIT B KADETHANKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.