Smt. Kushi Krushna Thombare & Ors. v. Chhaganlal Raichand Oswal & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Interim Application is allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Interim Application is allowed. Amendment to be carried outwithin period of two weeks from today and amended copies to beserved on all parties.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONINTERIM APPLICATION NO. 590 OF 2026INWRIT PETITION NO. 11132 OF 2022 Smt. Kushi Krushna Thombare and Others...Applicants/PetitionersVersusChhaganlal Raichand Oswal and Anr...Respondents ——————Mr. Nikhil Patil i/b Mr. P. M. Jadhav for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Govind B. Pawar for Petitioner. Mr. A. A. Alaspurkar, AGP for Respondent-State.—————— CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 9th June, 2026P. C. :
Interim Application has been preferred for bringing on recordlegal heirs of deceased-Respondent No. 2.
The application has been preferred within time.
Operative part
Interim Application is allowed. Amendment to be carried outwithin period of two weeks from today and amended copies to beserved on all parties.
Stand over to 13th July, 2026. [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]Sairaj1 of 1
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.