Hemlata Manikchand Chudiwal v. Gtl Infrastructure Limited (gil)..Advocate & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the above, the Arbitration Appeal is dismissed as withdrawnwith liberty as prayed for
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the above, the Arbitration Appeal is dismissed as withdrawnwith liberty as prayed for. The pending Civil Application also stands disposedof. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )vj gawade/-.Page 1 of 1
Judgment
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD967 ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2025 Hemlata Manikchand ChudiwalVERSUSGtl Infrastructure Limited (gil) And Another...Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Patodi Rajat VijaykumarAdvocate for Respondents No.1 and 2 : Mr. Arun v. Rakh...WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10205 OF 2025 IN ARBA/36/2025...CORAM :ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.Dated: March 18, 2026PER COURT :
The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that against theimpugned order, an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable. He, therefore, seeks leave towithdraw the present Arbitration Appeal with liberty to file appropriateproceedings.
Operative part
In view of the above, the Arbitration Appeal is dismissed as withdrawnwith liberty as prayed for. The pending Civil Application also stands disposedof. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )vj gawade/-.Page 1 of 1
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the Arbitration Appeal is dismissed as withdrawnwith liberty as prayed for
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 — s. 37.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.