M/S Shri Girraj Misthan Bhandar, Dhanghati v. State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 21 Mar 2025
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC:41460-DB
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Upon perusal of the documents, we are of the view that the present writ petition is premature in nature and the petitioner should be relegated before the adjudication Authority.
- Para 33. The petitioner is accordingly directed to file reply to the show cause notice before the Authority within a period of three weeks from the date.
- Para 55. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Judgment
Petitioner :- M/S Shri Girraj Misthan Bhandar, Dhanghati Goverdhan Mathura, Uttar Pradesh Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Pranjal Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India wherein the petitioner has approached this Court at the stage of show cause notice issued against it.
Upon perusal of the documents, we are of the view that the present writ petition is premature in nature and the petitioner should be relegated before the adjudication Authority.
The petitioner is accordingly directed to file reply to the show cause notice before the Authority within a period of three weeks from the date.
If such a reply is filed by the petitioner, opportunity of hearing should be granted to it and, thereafter, reasoned order shall be passed in accordance with law.
Operative part
With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
We make it clear that we have not gone into merits of the case. Order Date :- 21.3.2025 Sazia (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 21 Mar 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.