Kamal Kant v. Prakhar Tandon
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 61(2), 109(1), 303(2), 317(2), 318(4)
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive.
He has next submitted that in the instant case no one has sustained any injury and it is a case of no injury and as such impugned FIR is liable to be quashed.
Matter requires consideration.
Issue notice to respondent no.4, returnable within four weeks. Steps be taken within a week.
Learned AGA may also file counter affidavit within the same period.
Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within one week thereafter.
List this case on 20.04.2026.
Till then, the petitioner shall not be arrested in pursuance of the impugned F.I.R. dated 02.12.2025 giving rise to Case Crime No. 0405 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 109(1), 61(2), 303(2), 317(2) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Govind Nagar, District South (Commissionerate, Kanpur Nagar). February 16, 2026 Zafar (Achal Sachdev,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.