✦ Allahabad High Court

Nadeem & Anr. v. Indra Bhan Yadav, Vijay Kumar Yadav

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 28159 of 2025SIDDHARTHA VARMA, ACHAL SACHDEV

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2.

The instant petition has been filed seeking quashing of the F.I.R. dated 26.11.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0284 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 135, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 310(2) of B.N.S, 2023 and Section 3(1)(Da), 3(1)(Dha), 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act, 1989 Police Station Mirzapur, District- Saharanpur.

3.

Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the plots which the first informant had alleged in the khatauni were entered in the name of Simru, son of Chetu. Further, it has been submitted that from those plots 50 eucalyptus trees have been cut away by the accused persons.

4.

Learned AGA to take instructions in the matter specially with regard to the ownership of the plots.

6.

List this case on 18.12.2025.

7.

Till then the petitioners shall not be arrested in the aforementioned case. December 8, 2025 vijay krishna (Achal Sachdev,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 28159 of 2025). ← Search more judgments