Smt Sushma And 3 Others v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Sri Birendra Singh Khokher has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.4.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant-respondent no.4 learned AGA for the State- respondents and perused the record.
In counterblast implication of the petitioners by respondent no.4 is alleged.
Learned counsel for informant/respondent no.4 as well as learned AGA, may counter affidavit within four weeks. Petitioners may file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks, thereafter.
List this case after six weeks.
Till the next date of listing or till cognizance is taken by court on police report submitted under Section 193(3) B.N.S.S., whichever is earlier, the respondents are restrained from arresting the petitioners pursuant to the First Information Report dated 09.02.2025, registered as Case Crime No.0095 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 74, 79 of B.N.S., 8/12 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and 3(1)(d) and 3(2)(va) The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, Police Station-Kankar Khera, District Meerut, subject to cooperation in ongoing investigation. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 MN/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 193(3); Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 74, 79, 115(2), 351(3); Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 02 Apr 2025. The bench was SIDDHARTH, MOHD AZHAR HUSAIN IDRISI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.