Mohd Siraj @ Seraj v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 11 Feb 2025
- Bench
- SIDDHARTH, PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 173(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Connect with Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 22932 of 2024. For the reasons given in the interim order passed in connected petition, this writ petition also requires consideration.
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A for the State.
By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is assailing the legality and validity of the FIR dated 28.11.2024, registered as Case Crime No. 912 of 2024, under section 2(b)(i), 3(I) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Khalilabad, District Sant Kabir Nagar.
Connect with Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 22932 of 2024. For the reasons given in the interim order passed in connected petition, this writ petition also requires consideration.
Issue notice to the respondent no. 3.
Steps be taken within a week.
All the respondents may file counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Petitioner may file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks.
List after six weeks.
Till the next date of listing, or till submission of the police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. (now Section 193(3) of Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), whichever is earlier, the respondents are restrained to arrest the petitioner pursuant to the impugned F.I.R. subject to co-operation in the ongoing investigation. Order Date :- 11.2.2025 K.K. Maurya
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 173(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 11 Feb 2025. The bench was SIDDHARTH, PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.