✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

NIVEDITA P MEHTA

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

1 mca 441.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ARBN) NO. 441 OF 2025( Nirmal Ujjawal Credit Co-op. Society Ltd., Nagpur ..vs.. Hindustan Micro Finance Pvt. Ltd. ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Bhushan Dafle, Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Chinmay Dharmadhikari, Counsel for the non-applicant. CORAM : NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J.DATE : 13-10-2025Vide order dated 29-09-2025, the Court had proceededto pass an ex parte order against the non-applicant. In view ofthe fact that Mr. Chinmay Dharmadhikari, learned Counsel, hasnow entered appearance on behalf of the non-applicant and hisappearance is duly recorded, the ex parte order dated29-09-2025 stands recalled.

2.

The learned Counsel appearing for the parties jointlypropose the name of Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo, Former Judge ofthe Bombay High Court, to be appointed as the Sole Arbitrator. The Registry is directed to seek the consent and disclosure inwriting from Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo in terms of Sections 11(8)and 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3.

The applicant is directed to deposit Rs.10,000/- (RupeesTen Thousand only) towards processing fees with the Registrywithin one week. 2 mca 441.254.List the matter for further consideration after the Courtreopens post-vacation. (NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J.)adgokar

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments