Mca No. 1 of 2025 · Bombaynagpur High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ss. 11(8), 12(5)
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the submissions advanced on behalf of both sides, this Court is of the considered opinion that a dispute exists between the parties which is capable of being resolved through arbitration. Accordingly, Mrs. Mughda R. Chandurkar, learned counsel, is hereby appointed as…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPURMISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ARBN) NO.1/2025M/s SMW Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ambey Iron Pvt. Ltd. & others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's ordersMr. Deoul Pathak, Advocate for ApplicantMr. Anand P. Thakare, Mr. Rahul Gaikwad, Ms. Nikita Abhyankar, Advocates for Non-applicantsCORAM: NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J. DATED :28th NOVEMBER, 20251.Heard the parties at length.
In view of the submissions advanced on behalf of both sides, this Court is of the considered opinion that a dispute exists between the parties which is capable of being resolved through arbitration. Accordingly, Mrs. Mughda R. Chandurkar, learned counsel, is hereby appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
The learned Sole Arbitrator so appointed shall forward her written consent and disclosure statement in terms of Sections 11(8) and 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to this Court within the stipulated period.
It is clarified that the proceedings in Company Petition (MB)(IB) No. 251 of 2024 (Abhay Iron Pvt. Ltd. vs. SMW Ispat Pvt. Ltd.), pending before the 2 11-MCA-1-2025.odtNational Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, shall continue independently and shall not be influenced by the present proceedings or the appointment of the Arbitrator.
The applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000/- towards processing charges.
Stand over to 15.12.2025. (NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J.)MP Deshpande
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.