Suresh Bahadur @ Suresh Bahadur Saxena v. Sanjay Kumar Sharma
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Having heard rival submissions and perusing the record, we find that the dispute is purely inter se between private parties and demarcation proceeding under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code is also pending consideration. As such we are not inclined to entertain the…
- Para 44. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) October 29, 2025 SP/
Judgment
Heard Shri Ishank Srivastava and Shri Sanjay Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and Ms. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (in short "Authority").
The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents to execute the demolition order dated 12.6.2025 passed by respondent no.2.
Having heard rival submissions and perusing the record, we find that the dispute is purely inter se between private parties and demarcation proceeding under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code is also pending consideration. As such we are not inclined to entertain the instant writ petition to settle the private dispute between the parties. However, it is expected that in case any proceeding under Section 10 of the U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 is also pending consideration, the same shall be finalised in accordance with law expeditiously.
Operative part
The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) October 29, 2025 SP/
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 — s. 10.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.