✦ Allahabad High Court

Parmi Devi v. State Of U.P. And 5 Others

AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. 29739 of 2025AJIT KUMAR, SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In our considered view the relief is in the nature of injunction arising out of a pure civil dispute which may involve disputed questions of fact and hence, petitioner may avail remedy of civil suit, if so advised. Accordingly, we decline to grant indulgence…

Judgment

Firdos Ahmad C.S.C. HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.

1.

Heard Sri Firdos Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2.

By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for following relief:- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature directing of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to consider application dated 20.08.2025 under Section 10 National Commission Women Act, 1960 within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. "

3.

In our considered view the relief is in the nature of injunction arising out of a pure civil dispute which may involve disputed questions of fact and hence, petitioner may avail remedy of civil suit, if so advised. Accordingly, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter.

4.

Subject to aforesaid liberty this petition is consigned to records. October 13, 2025 Shiv (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. 29739 of 2025). ← Search more judgments