✦ Allahabad High Court · 09 Jul 2025

Vinod Kumar & Anr. v. State Of U.P. And 4 Others

WRIT - C No. 21164 of 2025MANISH KUMAR NIGAM

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

The writ petition is dismissed accordingly

Provisions considered

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Key paragraphs

Para 55. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.]

Read the judgment Go to the operative part Find similar cases

Judgment

It is admitted that award passed in the year 2016 has not been challenged.

In view of the same, no relief can be granted to the petitioners.

Operative part

The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.]

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is dismissed accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 09 Jul 2025. The bench was MANISH KUMAR NIGAM.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WRIT - C No. 21164 of 2025). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

What did the Court decide in this case?

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Which court decided this case, and when?

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

More cases under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Continue researching