Jitendra Kumar v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 01 May 2025
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC:69138-DB
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the writ petiton is disposed of without passing any further orders. Order Date :- 1.5.2025 Kuldeep (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Judgment
Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the recovery citation dated January 29, 2025 issued by the respondent authority.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondent submits that the recovery citation impugned in the present writ petition has been withdrawn by the Tehsildar, Kol, Aligarh vide order dated March 5, 2025.
In light of the submission made above, no cause of action remains.
Accordingly, the writ petiton is disposed of without passing any further orders. Order Date :- 1.5.2025 Kuldeep (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 01 May 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.