High Court

1. Heard Mr. Sudhir Kumar Kulshreshtha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anupam Kulshreshtha, learned counsel for respondent no.4/9, Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for respondent- Gram Sabha and Mr. Arunesh Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. Common issues are involved in both the aforementioned writ petition, as such, both the writ petitions are clubbed and heard together.

3. Stamp Reporter has reported laches of 1654 days in filing the Writ B No. 442 of 2025 as well as Writ B No. 444 of 2025.

4. Petitioner has explained the laches in para Nos. 21 to 27 of the writ petition which is not satisfactory but in place of dismissing the writ petition on the ground of laches, the matter should be decided on merit.

5. Brief facts of the case are that the agriculture lease was executed in favour of respondent second set on 6.5.1999 which was approved by Sub Divisional Officer on 15.6.1999. Petitioner and the proforma respondents have filed a complaint on 10.7.2001 challenging the allotment made by Land Management Committee on 6.5.1999/ 15.6.1999 in favour of respondent second set. The aforementioned complaint was registered as case No. 16 of 2001-02 (Computerized case No. D200518020016 and case No. 16 of 2001-02. Notice was issued to the allottees on 18.11.2002 by the respondent no.2/ Additional Collector Judicial Aligarh. Allottees have filed their objection stating that allotment was made after following the due procedure prescribed under the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act and the Rules framed thereunder. A report was submitted by the authorities on 20.8.2002/ 17.5.2003. Respondent no.2, Additional Collector vide order dated 8.6.2018 cancelled the allotment made by Land Management Committee dated 6.5.1999/ 17.12.1999/ 15.6.1999. Against the order dated 8.6.2018, allottees filed revision before the Board of Revenue which was registered as revision No. 1555 of 2018, Computerized case No. AL20181802001555 as well as revision No. 522 of 2020, Computerized case No. AL2020180200522 respondent no.1/ Board of Revenue vide order dated 23.4.2020 allowed both the revisions setting aside the order dated 8.6.2018 hence Writ B No. 442 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner/ complainant after about five years (1654 days) for the following relief:- "To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned judgement and order dated 23.4.2020 passed by Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at Prayagraj, the respondent no.1 in Revision No. 522 of 2020 (Computer case No. AL2020180200522) Kamal Singh Vs. Santosh Kumar and Others."

6. Writ B No. 444 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of petitioner/ complainant after about five years (1654 days) for the following relief:- "To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned judgement and order dated 23.4.2020 passed by Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at Prayagraj, the respondent no.1 in Revision No. 1555 of 2018 (Computer case No. AL20181802001555) Smt. Maya Devi and Others Vs. Santosh Kumar and Others."

7. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that lease was not executed in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Rules framed thereunder, as such, on the basis of complaint filed by petitioner along with proforma respondents, Additional Collector has rightly cancelled the lease executed in favour of allottees and directed to record the plot in question as Gaon Sabha plot. He further submitted that Board of Revenue has exceeded his revisional jurisdiction in setting aside the order passed by Additional Collector cancelling the lease of the allottees. He submitted that no proper munadi has taken place before execution of lease in favour of allottees, as such, the allotment cannot be sustained in the eye of law. He submitted that impugned orders passed by respondent no.1/ Board of Revenue are liable to be set aside and order passed by Additional Collector dated 8.6.2018 should be affirmed.

8. On the other hand, Mr. Anupam Kulshreshtha, learned counsel appearing for one of the allottee submitted that writ petition at the instance of the complainant after about 5 years from the date of passing of the order of Board of Revenue cannot be entertained. He further submitted that allotment was made after following the procedure prescribed under the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act and the Rules framed thereunder, as such, the allotment made in the year 1999 cannot be cancelled. He further submitted that Board of Revenue has properly exercised the revisional jurisdiction considering the evidence on record recording finding of fact that every procedure/ proceeding for allotment has been followed by the authorities, as such, the allotment made on 6.5.1999/ 15.6.1999 cannot be cancelled. He submitted that finding of fact has also been recorded by Board of Revenue that from the perusal of ZA Form 57 Kha, it is fully demonstrated that allotment has been made in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Rules. He further submitted that munadi/ agenda has properly taken place, as such, the lease executed on 6.5.1999/ 15.6.1999 cannot be cancelled. He submitted that no interference is required and writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

9. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

10. There is no dispute about the fact that agriculture allotment was made in favour of allottees/respondent second set on 6.5.1999/ 15.6.1999. There is also no dispute about the fact that petitioner along with proforma respondents filed a complaint and Additional Collector has cancelled the lease of the allottees vide order dated 8.6.2018. There is also no dispute about the fact that revision filed by allottees have been allowed by Board of Revenue vide order dated 23.4.2020 setting aside the order of Additional Collector dated 8.6.2018.

11. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in the matter, the perusal of finding of fact recorded by Board of Revenue will be relevant which is as under:- " नययययलय शश रयम मननहर ममशय, रयजसव पररषद, उ०प०, इलयहयबयद मयननशय सदसय, मणडलल- अलशगढ, जनपदल- अलशगढ वयद ससखययल- REV/522/2020/अलशगढ कमपययटरशकक त वयद ससखययल- AL2020180200522 कमल सससह बनयम सनतनष कक मयर व अनय असतगरत धयरयल- 333, उ०प० ज०मव० एवस भयमम सकधयर आददश मतसथल- 23/04/2020 आददश मक एजमडय व मकनयदश मक इस मनररय मम ऊपर उमलसखत मकयय गयय हह एजदडय पसतयव एवस 57 दयरय मदनयसक 22.11.1999 ख कक पमत पतयवलश पर रयजसव मनरशकक नद मदनयसक 22.11.2014 13- अवर नययययलय दवयरय पशनगत आददश मम मदयय गयय मत मक आवसटन पतयवलश नहह बनयई गई और न हश तहसशल मम जमय करयई गई, भश सवशकययर यनगय नहह हह। अमभलदखशय सयकय मकनयदश, ख कक सतय पमतसलमपययस रसजसटटयर कयनयनगन (आर०कद ०) जन पतयवलश पर समममसलत कक गई हह अतल इस समबनध मम अवर नययययलय दयरय अमभकथन कक आवसटन पतयवलश उपलबध नहह हह, मनरयधयर पतशत हनतय हह। मदनयसक जहसय भयमम पबनधक समममत कक बहठक कक कययरवयहश मदनयसक 06.05.1999 एवस 25.04.1999, कन अवर जदड०ए० 57 नययययलय मम पसतकत कक गई। यमद पतयवलश तहसशल मम उपलबध नहह थश, तन ऐसश मसथमत मम रयजसव मनरशकक दयरय उपरनक सयकयय कक पमत कह सद पसतकत कक जय सकतश थश। इस समबनध मम अवर नययययलय दयरय मबनय मवचयर मकयद हश जन मनररय मम अमभकथन वयक मकयय गयय हह, वह भश सवशकयर यनगय नहह हह। 14- पशनगत आददश मम अवर नययययलय दयरय मदयय गयय यह मत मक आवसमटयय कद नयम कक ररपनटर कद आधयर पर मदनयसक 14.02.2003 कन पमवमष फजर मयनतद हहए तहसशल कक आवसमटयय कद नयम कक पमवमष खततनश मम फजर मयनतद हहए उपसजलयसधकयरश दयरय मनरसत कर दश गई थश। सजससद पतयकतल सपष हह मक आवसटन कक कययरवयहश नहह हहई, आवसटन कक पतयवलश न तन बनश और न हश तहसशल मम अमभनलदखयगयर मम जमय कक गई तकमटपयरर हह। कययमक आवसमटयय कद नयम कक पमवमष खततनश वषर 2007-2012 फसलश मम मदनयसक 24.12.1999 कन पमवमष कक गई। परनतक उक पमवमष उपसजलयसधकयरश कद आददश मदनयसक 14.02.2003 दयरय फजर मयनतद हहए उ०प०भय०रय०असध० कक धयरय 33/39 कद अनतगरत कययरवयहश कर मवरद आवसटशगरय दयरय मय० मनरसत मकयद जयनद कद आददश पयररत मकयद गयद। उक आददश कद उचच नययययलय इलयहयबयद कद समक ससमवल मम० ररट मपटशशन ससखयय 14098 वषर 2003 पसतकत कक गई। मय० उचच नययययलय दयरय ययमचकय आददश मदनयसक 02.04.2003 दयरय उपसजलयसधकरश दयरय पयररत आददश मदनयसक 14.02.2003 सवशकयर कयर, कन मनरसत कर मदयय गयय। अतल उक कद समबनध मम पशन‌गत आददश मम मदयय गयय मत मक आवसमटयय कद नयम फजर इनदयज मकयद गयद थद, सवशकययर यनगय नहह हह। इसश पकयर अमभकथन मकयय ममहलययद घरदलय कययर करतश हह, उनकन भयमम आवसमटत नहह कक जय सकतश हह तथय मयययददवश पतनश सकशशल कक मयर बयहर रहनद वयलश हह एवस पययरदलयल सकनयरश कय कययर करतद हह, कद समबनध मम कनई सयकय उपलबध नहह करययय गयय हह। मकसश वयमक कक जयमत सकनयर हननद मम उसकद धनवयन हननद अथवय उसकद सननद कय वयवसयय हननद कक मसथमत कन पररभयमषत नहह मकयय जय सकतय हह। अतल अवर नययययलय कय यह मनषकषर तकमटपयरर हननद कद कयरर सवशकयर हननद यनगय नहह हह। यह कहनय मक ममहलययम कक मष कययर नहह करतश हह। अतल आवसटन हदतक पयत नहह हह, सवशकययर नहह हह। ददश मम ममहलयएस पकरषय कद सयथ कक मष कययर भश करतश आ रहह हह, एवस उ०प०जमह० एवस भय०वय०असध० मम कहह भश ममहलयओस कययमक आवसटन पतयवलश उपलबध नहह थश, तहसशलदयर दयरय पसतकतत आखयय मदनयसक 17.05.2003 कन आवसटन हदतक अपयत वयमक कक शदरश मम नहह रखय गयय हह। अवर नययययलय कय यह मत मक आवसटन पयरररप सद फजर हह एवस मनरसत मकयद जयनद यनगय हह। सयकय कद मवरद कथन मकयय गयय हह जन उपरनकयनकसयर मववदचनय कद आधयर पर मसथर यनगय नहह पययय जयतय हह। 15- कन सयकय दयरय ससद नहह मकयय गयय हह, यहयह तक मक लदखपयल कय बययन भश नहह करययय गयय हह। उपसजलयसधकयरश कक सवशकक मत कद समबनध मम कनई इनकयर नहह मकयय गयय हह। मय० बनडर आफ रदवदनयय इलयहयबयद रयजदश कक मयर आमद बनयम सटदट ऑफ यय०पश० (2005(98) आर०डश० दयरय मनररत नजशर, पदज 28 महनदश) मम यह वयवसथय दश गई हह मक सरकयर अथवय भयमम पबनधक समममत दयरय सयकय पसतकत मकयद मबनय मयत तहसशल आखयय कद आधयर पर, सजसद ससद नहह करययय गयय हन, तकमटपयरर एवस वहधयमनक नहह हह। आवसटन कक सभश कययरवयहश मवसधक पयमवधयनय कन अनकसयर कक गई हह। ततकयलशन पधयन दयरय अपनद बययन सद आवसटन कक समसत कययरवयहश कन ससद मकयय हह। उपरनक तथय पररमसथमतयय एवस मववदचनय कद आलनक मम पसतकत मनगरयनश सवशकयर कक जयतश हह। अवर नययययलय दयरय पयररत पशनगत आददश मदनयसक 08.06.2018 मनरसत मकयय जयतय हह। बयद आवशयक पतयवलश, दयसखल दफतर हन। अव अवर नययययलय कद अमभलदख वयपस मकयद जययद। सथगनयददश यमद कनई हन तन मनरसत मकयय जयय। यहश आददश मनगरयनश ससखयय 522 कमल सससह बनयम सनतनष सजलय अलशगढ पर भश लयगय हनगय तथय इसकक एक पमत उक पतयवलश पर रखश जयय। उस आधयर पर पटय कय मनरसतशकरर आददश सवरथय अनकमचत, वषर 2020 ह० अपठनशय डय० रयम मननहर ममश) आई०ए०एस० सदसय नययमयक 23.04.2020" 12. The perusal of finding of fact recorded by Board of Revenue as quoted above fully demonstrate that each and every aspect of the matter has been considered by Board of Revenue while setting aside the order passed by Additional Collector dated 8.6.2018. The finding of fact has also been recorded by Board of Revenue to the effect that munadi/ agenda proposal have properly taken place and true copy of Z.A. Form 57 Kha are available on record, as such, the finding recorded by Additional Collector that allotment proceedings are not available on record is totally misconceived. (

13. Considering the finding of fact recorded by the Board of Revenue as well as the filing of instant petition by complainant after about 5 years from the date of passing of the order by Board of Revenue dated 23.4.2020, there is no scope of interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 23.4.2020 passed by respondent no.1, Board of Revenue in the respective revision.

14. The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 13.2.2025/ Vandana Y.

1. Heard Mr. Sudhir Kumar Kulshreshtha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anupam Kulshreshtha, learned counsel for respondent no.4/9, Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for respondent- Gram Sabha and Mr. Arunesh Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. Common issues are involved in both the aforementioned writ petition, as such, both the writ petitions are clubbed and heard together.

3. Stamp Reporter has reported laches of 1654 days in filing the Writ B No. 442 of 2025 as well as Writ B No. 444 of 2025.

4. Petitioner has explained the laches in para Nos. 21 to 27 of the writ petition which is not satisfactory but in place of dismissing the writ petition on the ground of laches, the matter should be decided on merit.

5. Brief facts of the case are that the agriculture lease was executed in favour of respondent second set on 6.5.1999 which was approved by Sub Divisional Officer on 15.6.1999. Petitioner and the proforma respondents have filed a complaint on 10.7.2001 challenging the allotment made by Land Management Committee on 6.5.1999/ 15.6.1999 in favour of respondent second set. The aforementioned complaint was registered as case No. 16 of 2001-02 (Computerized case No. D200518020016 and case No. 16 of 2001-02. Notice was issued to the allottees on 18.11.2002 by the respondent no.2/ Additional Collector Judicial Aligarh. Allottees have filed their objection stating that allotment was made after following the due procedure prescribed under the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act and the Rules framed thereunder. A report was submitted by the authorities on 20.8.2002/ 17.5.2003. Respondent no.2, Additional Collector vide order dated 8.6.2018 cancelled the allotment made by Land Management Committee dated 6.5.1999/ 17.12.1999/ 15.6.1999. Against the order dated 8.6.2018, allottees filed revision before the Board of Revenue which was registered as revision No. 1555 of 2018, Computerized case No. AL20181802001555 as well as revision No. 522 of 2020, Computerized case No. AL2020180200522 respondent no.1/ Board of Revenue vide order dated 23.4.2020 allowed both the revisions setting aside the order dated 8.6.2018 hence Writ B No. 442 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner/ complainant after about five years (1654 days) for the following relief:- "To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned judgement and order dated 23.4.2020 passed by Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at Prayagraj, the respondent no.1 in Revision No. 522 of 2020 (Computer case No. AL2020180200522) Kamal Singh Vs. Santosh Kumar and Others."

6. Writ B No. 444 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of petitioner/ complainant after about five years (1654 days) for the following relief:- "To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned judgement and order dated 23.4.2020 passed by Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at Prayagraj, the respondent no.1 in Revision No. 1555 of 2018 (Computer case No. AL20181802001555) Smt. Maya Devi and Others Vs. Santosh Kumar and Others."

7. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that lease was not executed in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Rules framed thereunder, as such, on the basis of complaint filed by petitioner along with proforma respondents, Additional Collector has rightly cancelled the lease executed in favour of allottees and directed to record the plot in question as Gaon Sabha plot. He further submitted that Board of Revenue has exceeded his revisional jurisdiction in setting aside the order passed by Additional Collector cancelling the lease of the allottees. He submitted that no proper munadi has taken place before execution of lease in favour of allottees, as such, the allotment cannot be sustained in the eye of law. He submitted that impugned orders passed by respondent no.1/ Board of Revenue are liable to be set aside and order passed by Additional Collector dated 8.6.2018 should be affirmed.

8. On the other hand, Mr. Anupam Kulshreshtha, learned counsel appearing for one of the allottee submitted that writ petition at the instance of the complainant after about 5 years from the date of passing of the order of Board of Revenue cannot be entertained. He further submitted that allotment was made after following the procedure prescribed under the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act and the Rules framed thereunder, as such, the allotment made in the year 1999 cannot be cancelled. He further submitted that Board of Revenue has properly exercised the revisional jurisdiction considering the evidence on record recording finding of fact that every procedure/ proceeding for allotment has been followed by the authorities, as such, the allotment made on 6.5.1999/ 15.6.1999 cannot be cancelled. He submitted that finding of fact has also been recorded by Board of Revenue that from the perusal of ZA Form 57 Kha, it is fully demonstrated that allotment has been made in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Rules. He further submitted that munadi/ agenda has properly taken place, as such, the lease executed on 6.5.1999/ 15.6.1999 cannot be cancelled. He submitted that no interference is required and writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

9. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

10. There is no dispute about the fact that agriculture allotment was made in favour of allottees/respondent second set on 6.5.1999/ 15.6.1999. There is also no dispute about the fact that petitioner along with proforma respondents filed a complaint and Additional Collector has cancelled the lease of the allottees vide order dated 8.6.2018. There is also no dispute about the fact that revision filed by allottees have been allowed by Board of Revenue vide order dated 23.4.2020 setting aside the order of Additional Collector dated 8.6.2018.

11. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in the matter, the perusal of finding of fact recorded by Board of Revenue will be relevant which is as under:- " नययययलय शश रयम मननहर ममशय, रयजसव पररषद, उ०प०, इलयहयबयद मयननशय सदसय, मणडलल- अलशगढ, जनपदल- अलशगढ वयद ससखययल- REV/522/2020/अलशगढ कमपययटरशकक त वयद ससखययल- AL2020180200522 कमल सससह बनयम सनतनष कक मयर व अनय असतगरत धयरयल- 333, उ०प० ज०मव० एवस भयमम सकधयर आददश मतसथल- 23/04/2020 आददश मक एजमडय व मकनयदश मक इस मनररय मम ऊपर उमलसखत मकयय गयय हह एजदडय पसतयव एवस 57 दयरय मदनयसक 22.11.1999 ख कक पमत पतयवलश पर रयजसव मनरशकक नद मदनयसक 22.11.2014 13- अवर नययययलय दवयरय पशनगत आददश मम मदयय गयय मत मक आवसटन पतयवलश नहह बनयई गई और न हश तहसशल मम जमय करयई गई, भश सवशकययर यनगय नहह हह। अमभलदखशय सयकय मकनयदश, ख कक सतय पमतसलमपययस रसजसटटयर कयनयनगन (आर०कद ०) जन पतयवलश पर समममसलत कक गई हह अतल इस समबनध मम अवर नययययलय दयरय अमभकथन कक आवसटन पतयवलश उपलबध नहह हह, मनरयधयर पतशत हनतय हह। मदनयसक जहसय भयमम पबनधक समममत कक बहठक कक कययरवयहश मदनयसक 06.05.1999 एवस 25.04.1999, कन अवर जदड०ए० 57 नययययलय मम पसतकत कक गई। यमद पतयवलश तहसशल मम उपलबध नहह थश, तन ऐसश मसथमत मम रयजसव मनरशकक दयरय उपरनक सयकयय कक पमत कह सद पसतकत कक जय सकतश थश। इस समबनध मम अवर नययययलय दयरय मबनय मवचयर मकयद हश जन मनररय मम अमभकथन वयक मकयय गयय हह, वह भश सवशकयर यनगय नहह हह। 14- पशनगत आददश मम अवर नययययलय दयरय मदयय गयय यह मत मक आवसमटयय कद नयम कक ररपनटर कद आधयर पर मदनयसक 14.02.2003 कन पमवमष फजर मयनतद हहए तहसशल कक आवसमटयय कद नयम कक पमवमष खततनश मम फजर मयनतद हहए उपसजलयसधकयरश दयरय मनरसत कर दश गई थश। सजससद पतयकतल सपष हह मक आवसटन कक कययरवयहश नहह हहई, आवसटन कक पतयवलश न तन बनश और न हश तहसशल मम अमभनलदखयगयर मम जमय कक गई तकमटपयरर हह। कययमक आवसमटयय कद नयम कक पमवमष खततनश वषर 2007-2012 फसलश मम मदनयसक 24.12.1999 कन पमवमष कक गई। परनतक उक पमवमष उपसजलयसधकयरश कद आददश मदनयसक 14.02.2003 दयरय फजर मयनतद हहए उ०प०भय०रय०असध० कक धयरय 33/39 कद अनतगरत कययरवयहश कर मवरद आवसटशगरय दयरय मय० मनरसत मकयद जयनद कद आददश पयररत मकयद गयद। उक आददश कद उचच नययययलय इलयहयबयद कद समक ससमवल मम० ररट मपटशशन ससखयय 14098 वषर 2003 पसतकत कक गई। मय० उचच नययययलय दयरय ययमचकय आददश मदनयसक 02.04.2003 दयरय उपसजलयसधकरश दयरय पयररत आददश मदनयसक 14.02.2003 सवशकयर कयर, कन मनरसत कर मदयय गयय। अतल उक कद समबनध मम पशन‌गत आददश मम मदयय गयय मत मक आवसमटयय कद नयम फजर इनदयज मकयद गयद थद, सवशकययर यनगय नहह हह। इसश पकयर अमभकथन मकयय ममहलययद घरदलय कययर करतश हह, उनकन भयमम आवसमटत नहह कक जय सकतश हह तथय मयययददवश पतनश सकशशल कक मयर बयहर रहनद वयलश हह एवस पययरदलयल सकनयरश कय कययर करतद हह, कद समबनध मम कनई सयकय उपलबध नहह करययय गयय हह। मकसश वयमक कक जयमत सकनयर हननद मम उसकद धनवयन हननद अथवय उसकद सननद कय वयवसयय हननद कक मसथमत कन पररभयमषत नहह मकयय जय सकतय हह। अतल अवर नययययलय कय यह मनषकषर तकमटपयरर हननद कद कयरर सवशकयर हननद यनगय नहह हह। यह कहनय मक ममहलययम कक मष कययर नहह करतश हह। अतल आवसटन हदतक पयत नहह हह, सवशकययर नहह हह। ददश मम ममहलयएस पकरषय कद सयथ कक मष कययर भश करतश आ रहह हह, एवस उ०प०जमह० एवस भय०वय०असध० मम कहह भश ममहलयओस कययमक आवसटन पतयवलश उपलबध नहह थश, तहसशलदयर दयरय पसतकतत आखयय मदनयसक 17.05.2003 कन आवसटन हदतक अपयत वयमक कक शदरश मम नहह रखय गयय हह। अवर नययययलय कय यह मत मक आवसटन पयरररप सद फजर हह एवस मनरसत मकयद जयनद यनगय हह। सयकय कद मवरद कथन मकयय गयय हह जन उपरनकयनकसयर मववदचनय कद आधयर पर मसथर यनगय नहह पययय जयतय हह। 15- कन सयकय दयरय ससद नहह मकयय गयय हह, यहयह तक मक लदखपयल कय बययन भश नहह करययय गयय हह। उपसजलयसधकयरश कक सवशकक मत कद समबनध मम कनई इनकयर नहह मकयय गयय हह। मय० बनडर आफ रदवदनयय इलयहयबयद रयजदश कक मयर आमद बनयम सटदट ऑफ यय०पश० (2005(98) आर०डश० दयरय मनररत नजशर, पदज 28 महनदश) मम यह वयवसथय दश गई हह मक सरकयर अथवय भयमम पबनधक समममत दयरय सयकय पसतकत मकयद मबनय मयत तहसशल आखयय कद आधयर पर, सजसद ससद नहह करययय गयय हन, तकमटपयरर एवस वहधयमनक नहह हह। आवसटन कक सभश कययरवयहश मवसधक पयमवधयनय कन अनकसयर कक गई हह। ततकयलशन पधयन दयरय अपनद बययन सद आवसटन कक समसत कययरवयहश कन ससद मकयय हह। उपरनक तथय पररमसथमतयय एवस मववदचनय कद आलनक मम पसतकत मनगरयनश सवशकयर कक जयतश हह। अवर नययययलय दयरय पयररत पशनगत आददश मदनयसक 08.06.2018 मनरसत मकयय जयतय हह। बयद आवशयक पतयवलश, दयसखल दफतर हन। अव अवर नययययलय कद अमभलदख वयपस मकयद जययद। सथगनयददश यमद कनई हन तन मनरसत मकयय जयय। यहश आददश मनगरयनश ससखयय 522 कमल सससह बनयम सनतनष सजलय अलशगढ पर भश लयगय हनगय तथय इसकक एक पमत उक पतयवलश पर रखश जयय। उस आधयर पर पटय कय मनरसतशकरर आददश सवरथय अनकमचत, वषर 2020 ह० अपठनशय डय० रयम मननहर ममश) आई०ए०एस० सदसय नययमयक 23.04.2020" 12. The perusal of finding of fact recorded by Board of Revenue as quoted above fully demonstrate that each and every aspect of the matter has been considered by Board of Revenue while setting aside the order passed by Additional Collector dated 8.6.2018. The finding of fact has also been recorded by Board of Revenue to the effect that munadi/ agenda proposal have properly taken place and true copy of Z.A. Form 57 Kha are available on record, as such, the finding recorded by Additional Collector that allotment proceedings are not available on record is totally misconceived. (

13. Considering the finding of fact recorded by the Board of Revenue as well as the filing of instant petition by complainant after about 5 years from the date of passing of the order by Board of Revenue dated 23.4.2020, there is no scope of interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 23.4.2020 passed by respondent no.1, Board of Revenue in the respective revision.

14. The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 13.2.2025/ Vandana Y.