✦ Allahabad High Court · 04 Aug 2025

Raghuvansh Mishra Alias Raghuvansh Mani Mishra v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt

No. 6267 of 2025SHREE PRAKASH SINGH2 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
04 Aug 2025
Bench
SHREE PRAKASH SINGH
Neutral citation
2025:AHC-LKO:45168

Provisions considered

Judgment

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the chargesheet No. 01 of 2022, dated 28.09.2022, cognizance/summoning order dated 16.02.2023 issued by Additional Civil Judge (JD), Sultanpur as well as entire proceedings arising out of FIR No. 0469 of 2022, under Sections 323/504/506/427/34 IPC, Police Station Gosaiganj, District Sultanpur, pending before learned ACJM-5, room no. 51, Sultanpur. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that there is no evidence at all against the applicants and only on the basis of statement recorded by the police under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., the whole proceeding has been initiated. He added that the criminal proceedings against the present applicants are nothing but harassment. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the contentions aforesaid and submits that there is no abuse of process of law and only factual matrix has been agitated before this before this Court and that could not be gone into at this stage, invoking the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and thus, the application is liable to be dismissed. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that interest of justice would be sub- served, if this Court directs the court below to permit the applicants to appear before the court below and file an application for discharge. He further submits that the court below may be directed to decide the discharge application within stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this Court. Learned AGA appearing for the State has no objection to the aforesaid submissions. In view of aforesaid, the applicants are permitted to file an application for discharge before the court below within a period of two weeks from today and if such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided within a further period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 kkv/

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 161, 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 323, 427, 504, 506.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 04 Aug 2025. The bench was SHREE PRAKASH SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 6267 of 2025). ← Search more judgments