Kishan Chandra Upadhyay & Anr. v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko
Case at a glance
- Bench
- BRIJ RAJ SINGH
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. November 20, 2025 Rao/- (Brij Raj Singh,J.)
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and Sri Krishna Kumar Singh, complainant. learned counsel appearing
By means of this application, the applicants have prayed for quashing the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.278 of 2023, under Section 420 IPC, Police Station Bakshi Ka Talab, District Lucknow and the order dated 19.06.205 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Room No.31, Lucknow.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merits, but he submits that applicants would like to file an application for discharge under the provisions of Cr.P.C., to which learned AGA does not have any objection.
Accordingly, the applicants are granted liberty to file an application for discharge in conformity with the provisions of Cr.P.C., within a period of two weeks from today. In case the said application is filed within two weeks from today, the trial court is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter. The applicants are also granted liberty to appear through 2 A482 No. 5319 of 2025 their counsel. Till expiry of six weeks or till disposal of the discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. November 20, 2025 Rao/- (Brij Raj Singh,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.