✦ Allahabad High Court · 08 May 2025

Hawaldar Alias Rajendra And 2 Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt

No. 3664 of 2025ALOK MATHUR

Case at a glance

Decided
08 May 2025
Bench
ALOK MATHUR
Neutral citation
2025:AHC-LKO:26986

Outcome

Disposed of

The appeal is disposed of accordingly

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the appellant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the same…
  • Para 55. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 8.5.2025/Ravi/ (Alok Mathur, J.)

Judgment

1.

Heard Sri Dilip Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

2.

This application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of the Complaint Case No. 1123/2023, Criminal Misc. Case No. 8070/2022 (Ramawati alias Jaysuri Vs. Hawaldar Alias Rajendra and others) and the impugned summoning order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Court No. 7, Gonda by means of which the court has summoned the petitioner's U/S 323, 452, 354, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Gonda.

3.

Learned counsel for applicants, after arguing at some length submits that grievance of the applicants shall be redressed in case liberty is granted to the applicants to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the appellant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra).

Operative part

5.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 8.5.2025/Ravi/ (Alok Mathur, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 354, 452, 504, 506.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 08 May 2025. The bench was ALOK MATHUR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 3664 of 2025). ← Search more judgments