✦ Allahabad High Court · 05 May 2025

Surendra Kumar Tiwari v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

No. 3643 of 2025MANISH KUMAR

Case at a glance

Order date
05 May 2025
Bench
MANISH KUMAR
Neutral citation
2025:AHC-LKO:25725

Outcome

Dismissed

In view of above, the present application is dismissed as not

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rao Narendra Singh, learned AGA appearing for the State. Present case has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S. with following main prayer:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceeding i.e. impunged order dated 24.03.2025 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (JD) IIIrd/Judicial Magistrate, District Raebareli as well as Charge Sheet No. 16 of 2022 dated 15.01.2022 & Crl. Misc Case No. 28223 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 139 of 2021 dated 10.12.2021 under Section 406, 419, 420, 323, 504 & 506 IPC at Police Station Fursatganj, District Amethi, in the interest of of justice. " Learned AGA has raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the present application as the applicant have a statutory alternative remedy to file a revision under Section 397 Cr.P.c./438 B.N.S.S. In this regard, he placed reliance upon a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra, (1977) 4 SCC 551. Reliance has also been placed upon the judgments of this Court as well in the cases of Shailendra Agrawal and another Vs. State of U.P. and another (Application U/s 482 No. 24354 of 2023), judgment and order dated 17.08.2023, Nitin Tiwari and Ors. Vs. State of U.P. And others, 2024 (1) ADJ 885 and Ram Shanker Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others 2017 (6) ALJ 680. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant may be permitted to withdraw the present application as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a revision. In view of above, the present application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty, as aforesaid. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Ashish

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of above, the present application is dismissed as not

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 397, 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 406, 419, 420, 504, 506.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 05 May 2025. The bench was MANISH KUMAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 3643 of 2025). ← Search more judgments