✦ Allahabad High Court · 21 Feb 2025

Shravan Kumar @ Sarvan Kanojiya & Anr. v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

No. 1485 of 2025SANJAY KUMAR SINGH2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P./opposite party no.1 and perused the record. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the charge-sheet dated 16.02.2021, cognizance/summoning order dated 01.05.2024 and proceedings of Case No. 41625 of 2024 (State Vs. Gulab Singh and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 661 of 2020, under Section 323, 504, 325 IPC, Police Station Kakori, District Lucknow pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 6th, Lucknow. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned charge-sheet, cognizance/summoning order and criminal proceedings against the applicants and confined his submission requesting to grant some protection to the applicants to surrender before the concerned court below. The learned counsel for the applicants further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction may be issued to the concerned courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

Learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. submits that in case the applicants are not pressing the relief as sought for by them on merits and want to surrender before the concerned court below, he has no objection if the Court grants protection to them for a short period. In view of the above, the relief as sought by the applicants in the instant application is refused. However, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within two weeks from today and in case apply for bail, the bail application of the applicants shall be disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law and keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2021 SCC Online SC 922. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, they shall not be arrested in the above case. With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of. Order Date :- 21.2.2025 Shubham

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 325, 504.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 21 Feb 2025. The bench was SANJAY KUMAR SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 1485 of 2025). ← Search more judgments