Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Hence, I proceed to pass the followingorder:-O R D E R(i)The Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD933 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 367 OF 2025SAU PRACHI AMOL MULEY ALIAS PRACHI DEVIDAS KHARDEVERSUSAMOL SHIVAJI MULEY.…Mr. R. S. Salve h/f Mr. H. V. Tungar, Advocate for the Applicant .…CORAM: Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.DATE:February 18, 2026PER COURT :-
Heard Mr. Salve, the learned counsel for the applicant, at length.
Despite service, the non-applicant failed to appear inthe matter.
By the present application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the applicant / wife is seeking transfer of Petition No.A-295 of 2025 under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the HinduMarriage Act, filed by the non-applicant seeking decree of divorceand pending on the file of learned Family Court at Aurangabad tothe file of learned Family Court at Nashik, District Nashik. 933-MCA-367-20254.On perusal of the application, I have satisfied that theapplicant has made out substantial and bona fide grounds for transferof Petition No.A-295 of 2025 from the file of learned Family Court, Aurangabad to the file of learned Family Court, Nashik, DistrictNashik. 5. In view of above discussion, the present applicationdeserves to be allowed. Hence, I proceed to pass the followingorder:-
Operative part
O R D E R
(i)The Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed.
(ii)Petition No.A-295 of 2025 is hereby withdrawn from thefile of learned Family Court, Aurangabad and it istransferred to the file of learned Family Court, Nashik, District Nashik.
(iii)This order be communicated to both the Courts.
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] SMS 2 of 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, I proceed to pass the followingorder:-O R D E R(i)The Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 24.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.