✦ Allahabad High Court · 24 Apr 2025

Pradeep Kumar Kashyap v. Branch Manager, Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company Ltd And 2

Arbitration Case No. 26 of 2016JAYANT BANERJI

Case at a glance

Decided
24 Apr 2025
Bench
JAYANT BANERJI
Neutral citation
2025:AHC:62667

Provisions considered

Judgment

2.

It has been stated that the matter is at present pending before the Commercial Court, Gorakhpur and its transfer to the Commercial Court, Varanasi is sought. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the opposite party nos. 1 and 2 along with their employees and goons had hired miscreants employed for recovery of amount, who attacked the applicant on 9.9.2015 and beat him up badly. It has further been stated that till date, no issues have been framed by the Commercial Court, Gorakhpur in the matter and the Commercial Court is proceeding with the matter hurriedly without framing issues. Therefore, the applicant has no hope of justice with the Commercial Court, Gorakhpur.

3.

Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel had appeared on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2.

4.

When queried by the Court, learned counsel for the applicant has stated that no FIR has been lodged by the applicant in respect of the alleged attack made by the opposite parties on the applicant.

5.

The other allegations made in the transfer application may not be a ground for seeking transfer of the case inasmuch as the pending proceedings are under Section 9 of the Act, 1996 and it has not been demonstrated that whether since 2016 the applicant has taken any steps for referring any dispute for arbitration.

6.

This application lacks merit and is thus, dismissed. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 sfa/ (Jayant Banerji, J)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 9.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 24 Apr 2025. The bench was JAYANT BANERJI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Arbitration Case No. 26 of 2016). ← Search more judgments