Sahebrao Patil Shikshan Prasarak v. The State of Maharashtra----Mr.S.S.Tope, Advocate for applicantMr.P.S.Patil, AGP & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application stands disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The application stands disposed of. [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.] [R.G. AVACHAT, J.] KBP
Judgment
Cause title
6-.odtIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4655 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1369 OF 2006
Sahebrao Patil Shikshan Prasarak Mandalvs. The State of Maharashtra and ors.----Mr.S.S.Tope, Advocate for applicantMr.P.S.Patil, AGP for respondent no.1Mr.Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 3----
CORAM : R.G.AVACHAT AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ. DATE : APRIL 28, 2025
ORDER :-
Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
This Court, vide order dated 26.03.2025, disposed of thethe Writ Petition with a direction to the respondent - CIDCO to decide the applicant/petitioner's representation and pass a reasoned order. Said order appears to have been complied with. The respondent -CIDCO has recalled its order of cancellation of lease with a rider that the applicant/petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.24 Lakhs as penalty. Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner states that theapplicant/petitioner is ready to deposit that much amount; but seeks 26-some time. Learned counsel for the CIDCO strongly objects the same.
Admittedly, a sum of Rs.5,93,846/- has been deposited with this court towards lease penalty payable to the CIDCO, wayback in 2010. Office of this Court has already been directed to remit that much amount to CIDCO immediately. Said amount shall be given set off towards the penalty of Rs.24 Lakhs, directed to be paid by the applicants/petitioners. The balance amount shall be paid by the applicants/petitioners to CIDCO within five weeks.
Operative part
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.