✦ Bombay High Court · 02 Feb 2026

Mr. Ajit Kenjale a/w Mr. Azharuddin Khan, Mr. Sai Kadam for & Ors. v. GHUGE, J.) Vina Khadpe

Writ Petition No. 17502 of 2025ABHAY MANTRI2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This Writ Petition is disposed off in the above terms

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Our attention is invited to earlier orders passed in the Writ Petitions seeking similar relief. Thus, following the order passed in Writ Petition No.6020 of 2024 (Gurukul English Medium School Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.), dated 2nd May 2024, the following directions…

Judgment

Cause title

---- Mr. Ajit Kenjale a/w

Mr. Azharuddin Khan,

Mr. Sai Kadam for the Petitioners.

Mrs. P. N. Diwan, AGP for Respondent Nos.1/State. ---- Vina Khadpe 1 of 3

24.as.wp.17502.2025.odt

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2026

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE):-

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties.

2.

The sole request made in this Writ Petition is for a direction to release the amount of arrears which the Petitioners claim towards entitlement grants under the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

3.

Our attention is invited to earlier orders passed in the Writ Petitions seeking similar relief. Thus, following the order passed in Writ Petition No.6020 of 2024 (Gurukul English Medium School Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.), dated 2nd May 2024, the following directions are issued :- (i) Time of eight weeks is granted to the Respondents/State of Maharashtra to scrutinize the case of each Petitioner. (ii) The eligibility as well as quantum of reimbursement, would be determined by the concerned Respondent. (iii) The admissible amount of reimbursement to such Vina Khadpe 2 of 3

24.as.wp.17502.2025.odt Petitioner, be released within a period of two weeks thereafter. (iv) If any Petitioner is not entitled for any amount of reimbursement, a reasoned order to that effect be passed and such Petitioner would be at liberty to seek redressal of his grievance, in accordance with law.

Operative part

4.

This Writ Petition is disposed off in the above terms. Rule is discharged.

5.

List the above Petition for recording compliance on 24th April, 2026. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Vina Khadpe 3 of 3

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This Writ Petition is disposed off in the above terms

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 02 Feb 2026. The bench was ABHAY MANTRI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Another 8 relationships are under human verification and not counted above.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Later judgments that treat this case

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 17502 of 2025). ← Search more judgments