Chetan Prakash Bedmutha v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Nashik & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 02 Jul 2025
- Bench
- FIRDOSH P POONIWALLA, B P COLABAWALLA
Provisions considered
- Income Tax Act, 1961 s. 148
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8831 OF 2025 Chetan Prakash Bedmutha .. Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Nashik and Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Rutuja Pawar (through VC) a/w Ms.Hetal Laghave a/w Ms.Sneha More, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.A.K.Saxena, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: JULY 02, 2025 P. C.
At the request of the learned counsel for the Income Tax Department, the above matter is stood over to 7th July 2025.
In the meanwhile and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the operation, implementation and execution of the impugned notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 shall remain stayed. Mohite JULY 02, 2025 8 wp8831-25.doc
Stand over to 7th July 2025. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order. [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.] Mohite JULY 02, 2025
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Income Tax Act, 1961 — s. 148.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 02 Jul 2025. The bench was FIRDOSH P POONIWALLA, B P COLABAWALLA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.