Capri Global Housing Finance Ltd v. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. With aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. [ M.M. SATHAYE, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] Dixit
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4173 OF 2025 Capri Global Housing Finance Ltd. Vs. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane and Ors. .. Petitioner .. Respondents Mr. Nilesh Mandavkar, i/by Ms. Anjana Kamal Mishra, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. A.I. Patel, Additional Government Pleader with Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.2. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 7TH APRIL 2025. P.C. :
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings filed under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 on 3 rd April 2024 have not been decided till date. The petitioner has therefore filed the present writ petition seeking direction to decide the said proceedings expeditiously. It is informed that the proceedings are now fixed on 15th April 2025 for passing orders.
In case all necessary compliances have been made by the petitioner, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane shall consider the said application filed under Section 14 of the Act of 2002 on its own merits and Dixit decide the same finally, preferably on 15th April 2025, or within a period of three weeks thereafter.
Operative part
With aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. [ M.M. SATHAYE, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] Dixit
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 07 Apr 2025. The bench was M M SATHAYE, A S CHANDURKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.