Writ Petition No. 85 of 2026 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S G CHAPALGAONKAR
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. VII r. 10
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In light of submissions advanced, Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to take up alternate remedy as prayed.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABADWRIT PETITION NO. 85 OF 2026DNYANESHWAR MADHUKAR BHAGYAWANTVERSUSTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICTCOLLECTOR AND OTHERS...Mr. Vikram Shivaji Undre, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V. M. Lomte, AGP for Respondents-State.… CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : 07th JANUARY, 2026.P.C.:-
The learned Advocate appearing for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw Writ Petition with liberty to file Appealbefore learned District Judge, since order of return of plaint is passed in terms of Order VII Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure.
In light of submissions advanced, Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to take up alternate remedy as prayed.
Time consumed in prosecuting present Writ Petition shall beconsidered for exclusion while counting period of limitation. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR)JUDGEDevendra/January-2026
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.