Smt. Safiya Sultana v. A. Khalik & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 16 Jan 2025
- Bench
- KSHITI
Provisions considered
Judgment
Appellant :- Smt. Safiya Sultana Respondent :- A. Khalik And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Abhishek Kumar Jaiswal, Sumit Daga Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
The instant appeal under Section 96 CPC raises a challenge to an ex-parte judgment dated 05.11.2024 whereby the appellant's suit for declaration has been dismissed.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the trial court has mis-interpreted the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act.
Admit.
Issue notice to the respondents.
Steps be taken by registered post within two weeks.
Summon the photostat copy of the record of the trial court so that it must reach to this Court within next two months.
Requirement of filing formal paper book is dispensed with.
List for final hearing in May, 2025. Order Date :- 16.1.2025 AKShukla/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 96; Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 16 Jan 2025. The bench was KSHITI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.