IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION v. Reji PP & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ss. 11, 17
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 386 OF 2024 Tata Motors Finance Limited ...Petitioner Versus Reji PP and Anr . ...Respondents ----- Mr. Gaurav Jangle a/w Ms Akshita Jain a/w Mr. Akshit Vats i/b I V Merchat & Com for Petitioner. ----- CORAM : DATE : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. 7th APRIL 2026 P.C. 1 Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is presently pending before a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court and is listed on 18th April 2026. He, therefore, requests that the present matter be stood over until after that date. In the event that an arbitrator is appointed, the present petition filed under Section 9 may be converted and treated as an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. 2 Stand over to 4th May 2026. [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Meera Jadhav
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — ss. 11, 17.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 07 Apr 2026. The bench was ARIF S DOCTOR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.