TP No. 4646 of 2025 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
1) Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 4747. TP/4646/2025 (AMH20240004446C2024000 07) ) ) ) P.C.: 1) Petitioner, namely Mohammad Faheem Shaikh, has applied for the grant of Letters of Administration, under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short “IS Act”), for the properties left by the deceased, namely Shaik…
Judgment
Before: Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With the Testamentary Department Date 20th January 2026 Shri. Prasad Nagaroje Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner FOR COMPLIANCE:
TP/4646/2025 (AMH20240004446C2024000 07) ) ) ) P.C.: 1) Petitioner, namely Mohammad Faheem Shaikh, has applied for the grant of Letters of Administration, under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short “IS Act”), for the properties left by the deceased, namely Shaik Mohammad Firoz alias Mohammad Firoz Shaik,(For short “Said deceased”). 2) I have heard Ld. Advocate. I perused the documents, such as a true copy of the death certificate of the deceased, an identity proof of the deceased, an oath in the prescribed format, affidavit of service citation. 3) Said deceased died as a Widower on 27-06-2024 at Mumbai leaving behind him legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioner states that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. The deceased left properties shown in Schedule I of the petition. 4) Office issued Citation to all concern and same has been affixed on the Notice Board of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”).
An affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to the collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of the BHC Rules. Till today, no one has appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner, nor has anything been brought to the notice regarding pending litigation about the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as an uncontested one. 5) In view of the order passed by the Hon’ble Court in TP Nos. 2556 & 2559 of 2022 dated 28.02.2023, the petitioner, being the sole class-I heir of the deceased, is exempted from furnishing the administrative bond. 6) Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that in view of provisions of the The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, the petitioner, being Son of the deceased, is entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by 2 47.TP/4646/2025 the petitioner, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, the petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for.
Operative part
Hence, following order: ORDER 1) Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in the prescribed format, having effect throughout the State of Maharashtra as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2) The petitioner to file an account as undertaken in a Petitioner’s Oath within the stipulated period. 3) Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross-petition pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed. 20th January 2026 with the Testamentary Department Officer on Special Duty,
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 1) Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Succession Act, 1925; Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 20 Jan 2026.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.