Uday S. Jagtap v. Gourishankar Educational and Charitable Trust, Satara
Judgment
Mr. Vivek Patil a/w Mr. Arjun S. Pawar for the applicant …. Mr. P.P. Jadhav, APP for the respondent – State in ALP No.75/2024 and 81/2024 Dr. D.S. Krishnaiyer, APP for the respondent – State in ALP No.76/2024, 80/2024, 85/2024 Ms. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the respondent - State in ALP 77/2024 and 82/2024 Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, APP for the respondent – State in ALP No.78/2024 and 83/2024 Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for the respondent – State in ALP No.79/2024, 84/2024 and 74/2024 …. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 21st JANUARY, 2025. P.C.
Heard.
Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 4th February,
In addition to the Court’s notice, the applicant to serve the respondents with private service and shall file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. 2 of 3
Having heard learned Counsel for the applicant and looking to the nature of dispute, there is an element of settlement and the dispute can be resolved between the parties through the process of mediation. The Principal District Judge, Satara is requested to nominate a suitable trained District Judge as a Mediator to resolve the dispute between the employer and the employees by giving proper hearing to the respective parties.
After appointment of the Mediator, he shall fix the date/s of mediation as per his/her convenience and the convenience of the parties, especially either on 2nd or 4th Saturday so that the regular judicial work should not be hampered.
After the process of mediation, a report be forwarded to this Court, confidentially, on or before 21st March, 2025.
List on 24th March, 2025.
Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) 3 of 3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.