Aditya v. The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
2)Considering this request, the Petition is allowed to bewithdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to adopt such remedies whichmay be available in accordance with law
Judgment
Operative part
Gaikwad RD 11-wp-4072-2024.docIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4072 OF 2024 Aditya s/o. Ramsingh Agarwal…..PetitionerVs.The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.…..RespondentsMr. Sushil Upadhyay, i/b. Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi, for the Petitioner. Smt. Anamika Malhotra, Add.P.P., for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle, for Respondent No.2.CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL ANDDR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 14th OCTOBER 2024.P.C.:-1)Learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal ofthis Petition with liberty to adopt other remedies which may beavailable in law.2)Considering this request, the Petition is allowed to bewithdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to adopt such remedies whichmay be available in accordance with law.3)With these observations, the Petition is disposed of aswithdrawn. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)1/1
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 2)Considering this request, the Petition is allowed to bewithdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to adopt such remedies whichmay be available in accordance with law
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 14 Oct 2024. The bench was SARANG V KOTWAL ANDDR NEELA GOKHALE, NEELA GOKHALE, SARANG V KOTWAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.