Ambrish Yadav Alias Sonu v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 483
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 147, 149, 304, 323, 504, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 27.1.2025
Judgment
Applicant :- Ambrish Yadav Alias Sonu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shri Niwash Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 24 of 2011, arising out of case crime no. 499 of 2011, under Sections 147, 149, 304, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Madhuban, District Mau pending in the Court of Juvenile Justice Board, Mau expeditiously within stipulated period.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the accused in the said case. The case is running before the J.J. Board and is pending at the stage of recording of evidence and only one witness has been examined so far. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case.
Learned AGA opposed the prayer.
I have considered the submissions and perused the record.
It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that the case is pending at the stage of evidence and only one witness has been examined so far. Charges in the matter have been framed in the year 2014. It is a very sorry state of affairs that the matter of a juvenile offender is pending since the year 2014. Hence, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the case, preferably within a period of six months, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted.
It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case.
With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 27.1.2025
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 483; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 147, 149, 304, 323, 504, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 27 Jan 2025. The bench was CASE RUNNING.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.