✦ Allahabad High Court · 20 Jan 2025

Neha Singh v. State of U.P & Anr.

No. 2505 of 2024

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 20.1.2025

Judgment

Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.

1.

This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Complaint Case No.93 of 2020 (Neha Singh Vs. Dinesh Kumar Pandey) under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station Colonelganj, District Prayagraj pending in the Court of Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad, expeditiously within a stipulated period.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.

3.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the said case has been filed by the applicant / complainant under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act in 2020. Accused is not cooperating with the court and only dates are being fixed for appearance. Almost 4 years have been passed and it has not been decided as yet. Therefore, prayer has been made to decide the aforesaid complaint case expeditiously within a stipulated period.

4.

In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all possible endeavours and effective steps to ensure the appearance of the accused person before the court within a period two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is also directed that on the date fixed by the trial court the accused person shall appear before the Court and no adjournment or exemption for appearance will normally be granted to the accused on any ground whatsoever and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by the court concerned for expeditious disposal of the complaint case, as described above, if there is no legal impediment.

5.

It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case.

Operative part

6.

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 20.1.2025

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above observations, the application stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 483; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 138.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 20 Jan 2025.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 2505 of 2024). ← Search more judgments