✦ Allahabad High Court · 02 Dec 2024

Indresh Kumar Shukla v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others

No. 1021 of 2024

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With the aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The present application u/s 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with prayer to direct the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.9, Allahabad to decide the Case No. 2234 of 2009 (State vs. Ramtirth and others) under Sections 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Sarai Inayat, District Prayagraj expeditiously within stipulated period. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the matter is pending consideration before the court concerned. Expeditious disposal of a case is the right of every litigant and it is expected from every Court to endeavour to dispose of a case pending before it, expeditiously. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in this regard. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by learned counsel for applicant, it is expedient to direct the court concerned to make its endeavour to decide the case as expeditiously as possible on day to day basis without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. With the aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of finally. Order Date :- 2.12.2024 Puspendra

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 483; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 504, 506.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 02 Dec 2024.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 1021 of 2024). ← Search more judgments