Rajendra v. Rule 18 of the Bombay High Court Appellate SideRules
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
1 48 wp 7177-2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPURWRIT PETITION NO.7177/2024Rajendra s/o Champatrao KhawshiVs.The State of Maharashtra, thr. Its Secretary, Department of Marketing, Mumbai and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Shri R.L. Khapre, Senior Advocate a/w Shri Anup Dangore, Advocate for petitionerShri H.D. Futane, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 3Shri A.P. Kalmegh, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J. DATED : 10/03/2025In the present petition, Notification dated02.12.2024 (page 68) is under challenge. It is contention of the petitioner that though it is styled as Notification, it is the order passed by the District SubRegistrar, Co-operative Society, Wardha who is exercising powers of State Government.
Learned A.G.P. contended that Chapter 17Rule 18 of the Bombay High Court Appellate SideRules, 1960, there cannot be any challenge to the Notification before the Single Bench while exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
The Office to verify the position and report the same on 13.03.2025 at 2.30 p.m. JUDGER.S. Sahare
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.