✦ Allahabad High Court · 10 Jan 2025

Prashant Vashistha & Anr. v. Rajeev Kumar Agrawal

Case at a glance

Order date
10 Jan 2025

Provisions considered

Judgment

Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 1091 of 2024 Appellant :- Prashant Vashistha And Another Respondent :- Rajeev Kumar Agrawal Counsel for Appellant :- Sachin Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- Rajesh Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

1.

Adjournment has been sought by the learned counsel for the appellants.

2.

This Court finds that on 18.11.2024, this Court directed the appellants' counsel to go through the provisions of Order XXI Rule 97 of Code of Civil Procedure as the appeal has been reported to be not maintainable.

3.

As a last opportunity, matter is adjourned today.

4.

On the next date fixed, if the learned counsel for the appellants is not able to satisfy this Court regarding non-maintainability of the appeal, no further time shall be granted and the appeal shall be dismissed.

5.

Put up this case as fresh on 06.02.2025. Order Date :- 10.1.2025 Sazia

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXI r. 97.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 10 Jan 2025.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments