SNIGDHA MAYENKAR v. STATE OF GOA, THR. CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS
Judgment
MCA 265 of 2024 Senior Advocate for the petitioner, that the reasons for non-suiting of the petitioner is not made available to him, we expect the respondent no.2 to keep the record of the selection committee for our perusal on the next date. NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.Page 2 of 227th March, 2025
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MISC.CIVIL Application No. 265 of 2024).
← Search more judgments