Smt. Zamirulnisha Alias v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 21 Jul 2025
Provisions considered
Judgment
Petitioner :- Smt. Zamirulnisha Alias Zamirulnisha Mohammad Laik Shaikh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Ashish Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. If, as claimed by the petitioner's counsel, the arbitrator has given the award in petitioner's favour under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, and the challenge to the said award by the N.H.A.I. under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has come to an end on dismissal of the said proceedings, especially as the application for recall has also been dismissed, then, instead of filing this petition, the petitioner should have moved proceedings for enforcement/execution of the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or if there is any other remedy under the statute of 1956 or any rule made thereunder, to pursue the same. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J) (Rajan Roy, J) Order Date :- 21.7.2025 A.Dewal
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 34.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 21 Jul 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.