Anuj v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of above, the application is disposed of as
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 354, 452, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of above, the application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to appear before trial court within three weeks from today and file an appropriate application for bail, which shall be decided in the light of decision rendered in…
Judgment
Heard Sri Abhishek Gupta, learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for State- opposite party and perused the record.
Challenge in this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to Complaint Case No., 4595 of 2023 (Smt. Geeta vs. Anuj), under Section 323, 452, 354, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Dankaur, District -Gautam Budh Nagar, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Gautam Budh Nagar and pleased to set aside the impugned Summoning order dated 21.09.2024.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for applicant submits that he wants to withdraw the application and liberty may be given to the applicant to file a bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.
Operative part
In view of above, the application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to appear before trial court within three weeks from today and file an appropriate application for bail, which shall be decided in the light of decision rendered in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2021) 10 SCC 773. Order Date :- 1.5.2025 Bhanu
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of above, the application is disposed of as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 354, 452, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 01 May 2025. The bench was PRASHANT KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.