Mahkar Singh And 4 Others v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, the present application is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 323, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, it is provided that the parties shall appear before the court below along with a certified copy of this order on the next date fixed. It is therefore expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the parties…
- Para 66. In view of the above, the present application is disposed of.
Judgment
It has been contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 are family members and have amicably settled their dispute out of court and entered into a compromise. A copy of the compromise deed entered into between the parties has been annexed as Annexure-7 to the application and the same is filed before the Trial Court, learned ACJM, Court no. 6, Meerut.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute the correctness of the facts.
Accordingly, it is provided that the parties shall appear before the court below along with a certified copy of this order on the next date fixed. It is therefore expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the parties; compromise entered into between the parties and pass an appropriate order to that effect within next four weeks. It shall be open to the applicant to file a fresh application U/S 482 at that stage for the relief sought herein.
Operative part
In view of the above, the present application is disposed of.
For a period of six weeks, no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicants. Order Date :- 22.5.2025 Meenu Singh
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the present application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120B, 323, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 22 May 2025. The bench was DEEPAK VERMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.