High Court
Case Details
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:189395 Court No. - 52 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33970 of 2024
Legal Reasoning
Applicant :- Arpit Srivastava And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Priti Choudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Ms. Priti Choudhary, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed by the applicants to quash entire proceedings of Case No. 36313 of 2019 (State v. Arpit Srivastava & another), arising out of Case Crime No. 26 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Kidwai Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar. 3. This is the second 482 application filed under the changed circumstances, in which on 21.10.2024, the following order was passed:- "1. Heard Ms. Priti Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Shashi Kant Rai, learned AGA for the State, and perused the record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed by the applicants to quash entire proceedings of Case No. 36313 of 2019 (State v. Arpit Srivastava & another), arising out of Case Crime No. 26 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kdiwai Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the parties have reconciled their differences and a compromise has been entered between them. In this regard, an application and affidavit have been moved by opposite party no. 2 that she does not want to proceed with the case as she has entered into a compromise and is living happily with her husband. Copy of said application and affidavit have been annexed as Annexure no. 3 to the affidavit, therefore, continuance of proceedings against the applicants would be futile exercise and wastage of time of the Court and will be abuse of process of law. Hence, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed in the light of law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303. 4. Learned AGA does not dispute the correctness of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants. 5. Whether a compromise has taken place or not can at best be ascertained by the court, where the proceedings are pending, after ensuring the presence of the parties before it. 6. In view of the above, parties are directed to appear before the court below along with a certified copy of this order and permitted to file proper application and compromise deed within three weeks from today. It is expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of said compromise and after ensuring the presence of parties, pass an appropriate order with respect to the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. While passing the order verifying the compromise, the concerned court shall also record the statements of the parties as to whether all the terms and conditions mentioned in the original compromise deed, so filed, have been fulfilled or not. 7. If the said compromise is verified, the same shall be made part of the record and report to that effect, will be prepared and the parties would be allowed to obtain certified copy thereof and file the same before this Court. 8. Put up this case on 03.12.2024, as fresh, along with compromise verification report. 9. Till then, no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case." 4. In compliance of the order dated 21.10.2024, compromise verification report received from Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Kanpur Nagar is placed on record as is evident from office report dated 02.12.2024. The letter of Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Kanpur Nagar dated 29.10.2024 has been placed on record along with order dated 28.10.2024 vide which compromise between the parties has been verified. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that since the compromise entered between the parties has been verified by the court below, the entire proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case may be quashed by this Court. 6. Learned A.G.A. for the State also accepts that the parties have entered into a compromise and the copy of the same has also been enclosed along with verification order, he has no objection, if the proceedings in the aforesaid case are quashed. 7. This Court is not unmindful of the following judgements of the Apex Court: (i). B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and Another; (2003)4 SCC 675, (ii). Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation; (2008) 9 SCC 677, (iii). Manoj Sharma Vs. State and Others; (2008) 16 SCC 1, (iv). Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab; (2012); 10 SCC 303, (v). Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab; ( 2014) 6 SCC 466, 8. In the aforesaid judgments, the Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another; 2013 (83) ACC 278 and Pramod & Another Vs. State of U.P. & Another (Application U/S 482 No.12174 of 2020, decided on 23rd February, 2021) and Daxaben Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 936 in which the law expounded by the Apex court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, the court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose shall be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned criminal case as the parties have already settled their dispute. 10. Accordingly, proceedings of Case No. 36313 of 2019 (State v. Arpit Srivastava & another), arising out of Case Crime No. 26 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Kidwai Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar, on the basis of compromise, are hereby quashed. 11. The application is, accordingly, allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Order Date :- 3.12.2024 Rahul.